<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nhcaselaw.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Arbitration</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/category/topics/arbitration</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>MBNA Bank America, NA v. Cornock, 03-C-0018 (Hillsborough, North, Jul. 11, 2007)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/719</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In this civil action, the plaintiff, MBNA America Bank, NA (&quot;MBNA&quot;), sought to enforce an arbitration award against the defendant, Troy T. Cornock (&quot;the defendant&quot;). On March 20, 2007, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant and found that the arbitration award was unenforceable as a matter of law. However, the defendant has filed multiple counterclaims against MBNA which require resolution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/719&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/719#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:05:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Roger B. Phillips</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">719 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>MBNA Bank America, NA v. Cornock, 03-C-0018 (Hillsborough, North, Mar. 20, 2007)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/715</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE&lt;br /&gt;
HILLSBOROUGH, SS	SUPERIOR COURT&lt;br /&gt;
NORTHERN DISTRICT	2007&lt;br /&gt;
MBNA AMERICA BANK, NA&lt;br /&gt;
v.&lt;br /&gt;
TROY T. CORNOCK&lt;br /&gt;
03-C-0018&lt;br /&gt;
ORDER ON DEFENDANT&#039;S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT&lt;br /&gt;
In this civil action, the plaintiff, MBNA America Bank, NA (&quot;MBNA&quot;), seeks to enforce an arbitration award against the defendant, Troy T. Cornock (&quot;the defendant&quot;). Presently before the Court is the defendant&#039;s motion for summary judgment. MBNA objects. After consideration of the parties&#039; pleadings, evidence, argument, and applicable law, the Court grants the defendant&#039;s motion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/715&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/715#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:41:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Roger B. Phillips</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">715 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Best Value Plumbing and Heating, LLC v. IDEARC Media Corporation, 06-C-0318 (Merrimack, Mar. 13, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/388</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE&lt;br /&gt;
SUPERIOR COURT&lt;br /&gt;
MERRIMACK, SS.&lt;br /&gt;
BEST VALUE PLUMBING AND HEATING, LLC&lt;br /&gt;
V.&lt;br /&gt;
IDEARC MEDIA CORPORATION&lt;br /&gt;
ORDER&lt;br /&gt;
06-C-0318&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The defendant, ldearc Media Corporation (&quot;Idea&quot;), has filed a motion requesting that the Court modify its scheduling order, stay the proceedings, and compel the plaintiff to arbitrate its claims. The plaintiff, Best Value Plumbing and Heating, LLC (&quot;Best Value&quot;) objects. Upon review of the parties&#039; arguments, their submissions and the applicable law, the Court finds and rules as follows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/388&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/388#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 22:54:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DLG</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">388 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
