<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nhcaselaw.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Motion to Compel</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/category/topics/motion-compel</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>MBNA Bank America, NA v. Cornock, 03-C-0018 (Hillsborough, North, Jul. 11, 2007)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/719</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In this civil action, the plaintiff, MBNA America Bank, NA (&quot;MBNA&quot;), sought to enforce an arbitration award against the defendant, Troy T. Cornock (&quot;the defendant&quot;). On March 20, 2007, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant and found that the arbitration award was unenforceable as a matter of law. However, the defendant has filed multiple counterclaims against MBNA which require resolution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/719&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/719#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:05:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Roger B. Phillips</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">719 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cady v. Laro Revocable Trust, 02-C-850 (Hillsborough, North, Jun. 20, 2003)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/636</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE&lt;br /&gt;
HILLSBOROUGH, SS	SUPERIOR COURT&lt;br /&gt;
NORTHERN DISTRICT&lt;br /&gt;
No. 02-C-850&lt;br /&gt;
David and Elaine Cady&lt;br /&gt;
v.&lt;br /&gt;
Laro Revocable Trust&lt;br /&gt;
Donald Laro, Trustee&lt;br /&gt;
OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFFS&#039; MOTION TO COMPEL&lt;br /&gt;
NOW COMES the defendant, Donald Laro, by his attorneys, Wiggin &amp;amp; Nourie, P.A., and files this objection to plaintiffs&#039; motion to compel, and states as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
1.	This personal injury action arises from an accident that allegedly occurred on the defendant&#039;s property at 408 Elm Street, Goffstown, NH on October 11, 2000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/636&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/636#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/david-cady">David Cady</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/donald-laro">Donald Laro</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/elaine-cady">Elaine Cady</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/city/goffstown">Goffstown</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/industryterm/insurance">insurance</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/company/laro-revocable-trust">Laro Revocable Trust</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/provinceorstate/new-hampshire">New Hampshire</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/provinceorstate/new-hampshire-nhillsborough">NEW HAMPSHIRE \nHILLSBOROUGH</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/organization/ss-superior-court">SS	SUPERIOR COURT</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/wiggin">Wiggin</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:55:41 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>NHCaseLaw.com</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">636 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fleet Bank - NH v. Infantine, et al., 92-C-236 (Hillsborough, North, Sep. 12, 1994)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/526</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hearing was held on September 7, 1994 with regard to various pending motions. Present were Attorney Richard Inglis, representing the Estate of Infantine; Attorney Richard A. Mitchell, representing Fleet Bank of New Hampshire; Attorneys Emily G. Rice and John T. Broderick, representing Fleet Bank of New Hampshire; Attorney Charles Douglas, III, representing Robert Audley; Attorney Timothy Sheedy, representing Robert H. Brooks; Attorney William S. Gannon, representing Robert Brooks, R. Scott Brooks, HABS/CDM, Inc. and RSA Corp. and R. Scott Brooks, pro se, representing ABI Corp.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/526&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/526#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:43:32 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DLG</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">526 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Estate of Kenison v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, et al., 00-C-042 (Coos, Jan. 12, 2005)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/425</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE&lt;br /&gt;
COOS, SS	SUPERIOR COURT&lt;br /&gt;
Docket No, 00-C,-042&lt;br /&gt;
Estate of Donald G. Kenison, Sr.&lt;br /&gt;
v.&lt;br /&gt;
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital&lt;br /&gt;
ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pending before the Court is the plaintiffs Motion to Compel (index 114), to which the defendants object (index 121). Upon review of the motion and objection, and of pages 15 Through 17 of the deposition of Polly K. Campion, the Court determines as follows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/425&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/425#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:28:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DLG</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">425 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Jun. 15, 2005)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/400</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At issue in plaintiffs&#039; motion to compel are various documents that plaintiffs had sought from defendant New Hampshire Republican State Committee (&quot;NHRSC&quot;) during discovery in this civil action. In earlier proceedings, the Court had entered various discovery orders. Plaintiffs assert that NHRSC has failed to comply with the discovery orders as entered by the Court.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/400&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/400#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 22:44:54 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DLG</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">400 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
