<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nhcaselaw.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Procedural Due Process</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/category/topics/procedural-due-process</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Kelsey, et al. v. Town of Hanover, 2007-702 (N.H. S.Ct., Aug. 20, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/834</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;BRODERICK, C.J. The petitioners, Preston T. Kelsey, II, Virginia R. Kelsey, Dirk J. Van Leeuwen, Frank Holloway, Ann Holloway, Robert McLaughry and Ann McLaughry, appeal the decision of the Superior Court (Vaughan, J.) upholding the dismissal of their appeal of a zoning permit granted by the respondent, the Town of Hanover (Town), to Jerry and Claire Strochlic. We affirm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/files/kelsey.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/834#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:58:26 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>NHCaseLaw.com</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">834 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>MBNA Bank America, NA v. Cornock, 03-C-0018 (Hillsborough, North, Mar. 20, 2007)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/715</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE&lt;br /&gt;
HILLSBOROUGH, SS	SUPERIOR COURT&lt;br /&gt;
NORTHERN DISTRICT	2007&lt;br /&gt;
MBNA AMERICA BANK, NA&lt;br /&gt;
v.&lt;br /&gt;
TROY T. CORNOCK&lt;br /&gt;
03-C-0018&lt;br /&gt;
ORDER ON DEFENDANT&#039;S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT&lt;br /&gt;
In this civil action, the plaintiff, MBNA America Bank, NA (&quot;MBNA&quot;), seeks to enforce an arbitration award against the defendant, Troy T. Cornock (&quot;the defendant&quot;). Presently before the Court is the defendant&#039;s motion for summary judgment. MBNA objects. After consideration of the parties&#039; pleadings, evidence, argument, and applicable law, the Court grants the defendant&#039;s motion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/715&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/715#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:41:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Roger B. Phillips</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">715 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Carew, et al. v. State, 91-E-532-B (Merrimack, Jan. 27, 1992)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/404</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE&lt;br /&gt;
MERRIMACK, SS SUPERIOR COURT&lt;br /&gt;
James Carew and Alfred T. Rubega&lt;br /&gt;
v.&lt;br /&gt;
State of New Hampshire&lt;br /&gt;
No. 91-E-532-B&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ORDER&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/404&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/404#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 22:55:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DLG</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">404 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>State v. Abram, 2007-036 (N.H. S.Ct., Jan. 15, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/266</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;DUGGAN, J. The defendant, Scott Abram, appeals the sentence imposed by the Trial Court (McGuire, J.) upon remand from our decision in State v. Abram, 153 N.H. 619 (2006). We vacate and remand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/files/abram.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/266#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/provinceorstate/new-hampshire">New Hampshire</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/scott-abram">Scott Abram</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/organization/trial-court">Trial Court</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:50:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>NHCaseLaw.com</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">266 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Appeal of Murdock, 2007-297 (N.H. S.Ct., Feb. 15, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/261</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;GALWAY, J. The petitioner, Donald W. Murdock, appeals the decision of the New Hampshire Personnel Appeals Board (PAB) affirming his dismissal from employment by the respondent, the New Hampshire Department of Transportation (DOT), following his receipt of three written warnings for the same offense within a five-year period. N.H. Admin. Rules, Per 1001.08(b)(1) (current version at 1002.08(c)(1)). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/files/murdock.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/261#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/donald-w-murdock">Donald W. Murdock</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/provinceorstate/new-hampshire">New Hampshire</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/organization/new-hampshire-department-transportation">New Hampshire Department of Transportation</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/organization/new-hampshire-personnel-appeals-board">New Hampshire Personnel Appeals Board</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:24:48 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>NHCaseLaw.com</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">261 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Correia v. Town of Alton, 07-E-070 (Belknap, Mar. 24, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/201</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The petitioner, Edward Correia, seeks review of the decision of the respondent board of selection (&quot;board&quot;) of the Town of Alton (&quot;town&quot;) to terminate him.  See RSA 41:48.  Specifically, Mr. Correia argues that the board lacked sufficient cause to discharge him and that a number of procedural errors deprived him of procedural due process.  The town objects, asserting that the discharge was lawful and the procedures afforded to Mr. Correia were sufficient to satisfy due process requirements.  Because Mr.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/201&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/201#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:51:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DLG</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">201 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
