Nondisclosure

State v. Dodds, 07-S-229 (Strafford, Aug. 8, 2008)

NHCaseLaw.com — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:01:46 -0500

Before the court are identical motions filed by the Union Leader and Foster's Daily Democrat to unseal two previously sealed items of evidence: a collection of letters found in the home of the defendant, and a mental health evaluation report.

Weare Powerful v. Town of Weare, et al., 94-E-182 (Belknap, Dec. 16, 1994)

DLG — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:10:01 -0500

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
HILLSBOROUGH, SS. SUPERIOR COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT
Weare Powerful
v.
Town of Weare, et al.
Docket No. 94-E-182
OPINION AND ORDER
LYNN, J.
This suit under the Right-to-Know Law, RSA Chapter (1) 91-A, was commenced by Weare Powerful, a non-profit group composed of citizens of the Town of Weare ("Town"), against the Town, certain present and former members of the board of selectmen, the town administrator and town counsel, by a petition filed in this court on June 6, 1994.

Ball v. Jasper, et al., 93-E-0470 (Hillsborough, North, Sep. 30, 1993)

DLG — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:38:50 -0500

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
HILLSBOROUGH, SS SUPERIOR COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT
Richard J. Ball, Jr.
v.
Representative Shawn Jasper, et al.
93-E-0470
ORDER
On September 27, 1993, the Court heard Richard Ball's petition for temporary injunctive relief by way of offers of proof. The relevant facts are as follows.
Plaintiff is currently employed as the Director of Human Resources for Hillsborough County. However, on October 1, 1993, budget reductions implemented by the County Convention for his department will go into effect, effectively eliminating a position from the department.

City of Dover v. Union Leader Corp., 06-E-177 (Strafford, Nov. 30, 2006)

DLG — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:53:29 -0500

The petitioner, the City of Dover ("the City"), brings this petition for declaratory judgment, requesting clarification to this court's order in docket #04-E-173 ('the prior order") in light of a request for information under the State's Right-to-Know Law, RSA Chapter 91-A. The respondent, the New Hampshire Union Leader ("the Union Leader"), seeks the disclosure of detailed information regarding City of Dover employment salaries and benefits. The court held a hearing on this matter on November 20, 2006.

Christie v. Town of Durham, et al., 00-E-069 (Strafford, Apr. 25, 2000)

DLG — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:34:12 -0500

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
STRAFFORD, SS. SUPERIOR COURT
Thomas C. Christie
V.
Town of Durham and Ilene Healy, Town Administrator
00-E-069
ORDER ON PETITION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF UNDER RSA 91-A

Telegraph Publishing Co. v. City of Nashua et al., 08-E-186 (Hillsborough, South, Apr. 29, 2008)

NHCaseLaw.com — Fri, 02 May 2008 16:31:15 -0500

This is a petition by the publisher of a daily newspaper in Nashua, seeking a determination by the Court that the Nashua Board of Alderman violated RSA 91-A, the so called Right-to-Know Law, by meeting in closed session with the Nashua Board of Education. Petitioner also seeks an award of attorney's fees for litigating this matter. For the reasons set forth herein, the petition is GRANTED.

Lamy v. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission, 2004-343 (N.H. S.Ct., Apr. 11, 2005)

NHCaseLaw.com — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:06:13 -0500

Nadeau, J. The respondent, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (PUC), appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Lewis, J.) granting the request of the petitioner, Brian D. Lamy, for an order compelling the PUC to disclose the names and street addresses of certain customers and awarding the petitioner costs under RSA 91-A:8 (Supp. 2004). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Lamy v. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission, 04-E-041 (Merrimack, Apr. 14, 2004)

DLG — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:24:43 -0600

This case arises out of a dispute between Mr. Brian Lamy (“petitioner”) and the Public Utilities Commission (“PUC”), in which the PUC denied the petitioner’s request to disclose the names and addresses of Public Service of New Hampshire (“PSNH”) customers who had submitted voltage complaints to PSNH between July 1, 1999 and August 1, 2003. Before the Court is the petitioner’s request for injunctive relief to require disclosure of those names and addresses, pursuant to New Hampshire’s Right-to-Know Law.