<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nhcaselaw.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Overbreadth</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/category/topics/overbreadth</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>State v. Gubitosi, 2006-283 (N.H. S.Ct., Oct. 10, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/1110</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;GALWAY, J. The defendant, Steve Gubitosi, was convicted of three counts of harassment, see RSA 644:4 (2007), and one count of stalking, see RSA 633:3-a (2007), following a jury trial in Superior Court (McGuire, J.). On appeal, he contends that the superior court did not have jurisdiction over the matter because the prosecutor was not properly appointed. In addition, he argues that his conviction pursuant to RSA 644:4, I(b) must be reversed because the statute is unconstitutionally overbroad. We affirm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/files/gubitosi.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/1110#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/kelly-ayotte">Kelly A. Ayotte</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/organization/law-office-joshua-l-gordon">Law Office of Joshua L. Gordon</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/steve-gubitosi">Steve Gubitosi</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/organization/superior-court">Superior Court</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:06:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>NHCaseLaw.com</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1110 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Arnoldy, et al. v. City of Manchester, et al., 04-C-0516 (Hillsborough, North, Feb. 1, 2005)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/397</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The plaintiffs, Chris Arnoldy (&quot;Arnoldy&quot;) and Rebecca Drummond (&quot;Drummond&quot;), have brought a civil action against the City of Manchester (&quot;the City&quot;), the Manchester Police Department (&quot;the Police Department&quot;), and Manchester Police Officer Stephen Coco (&quot;Coco&quot;). This action arises out of Officer Coco&#039;s alleged shooting of the plaintiffs&#039; dog, &quot;Toby,&quot; in a local park. The City and the Police Department move to dismiss all counts of the action. In addition, Coco has filed a motion to dismiss two of the counts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/files/arnoldyII-hillsnorth.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/397#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 22:35:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DLG</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">397 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>State v. Daaboul, 07-S-1674 (Hillsborough, South, May. 8, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/238</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;LYNN, C.J. The defendant, George Daaboul, is charged with one count of using a computer on-line service to solicit a person he believed to be a child under age 16 to engage in sexual activity, in violation of RSA 649-B:4 (2007). The defendant has filed two motions to dismiss the indictment. The State objects. For the reasons set forth below, the motions are DENIED.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/238&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/238#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/industryterm/fictitious-online-profile">fictitious online profile</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/george-daaboul">George Daaboul</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/city/hudson">Hudson</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/organization/hudson-police-department">Hudson Police Department</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/provinceorstate/massachusetts">Massachusetts</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/michael-niven">Michael Niven</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/provinceorstate/new-hampshire">New Hampshire</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/industryterm/online-chats">online chats</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/city/topsfield">Topsfield</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/company/yahoo">Yahoo!</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/company/yahoo-inc">Yahoo! Inc.</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:54:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>NHCaseLaw.com</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">238 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>State v. Theriault, 2007-356 (N.H. S.Ct., May. 2, 2008)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/opinion/224</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;HICKS, J. The defendant, Robert Theriault, appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Conboy, J.) denying his motion to dismiss the charges against him. We affirm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/files/theriault.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/opinion/224#comments</comments>
 <enclosure url="http://nhcaselaw.com/files/theriault.pdf" length="44501" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:33:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>NHCaseLaw.com</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">224 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>State v. Grant-Chase, 01-S-1141 (Hillsborough, North, Feb. 8, 2002)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/131</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;HILLSBOROUGH, SS. SUPERIOR COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;N0. 01-S-1141&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;V.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CINDY GRANT-CHASE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OPINION AND ORDER&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LYNN, J.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/document/131&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/organization/american-law-institute">American Law Institute</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/city/boston">Boston</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/organization/brandenburg-court">Brandenburg Court</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/brennan">Brennan</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/bruce-ciccone">Bruce Ciccone</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/carol-carriola">Carol Carriola</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/industryterm/case-law">case law</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/industryterm/case-law-bears">case law bears</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/cheryl-ciccone">Cheryl Ciccone</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/cindy-grant-chase">Cindy Grant-Chase</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/commentary">Commentary</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/provinceorstate/delaware">Delaware</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/country/egypt">Egypt</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/hosni-mubarak">Hosni Mubarak</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/laurence-h-tribe">Laurence H. Tribe</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/industryterm/law-violation">law violation</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/provinceorstate/new-hampshire">New Hampshire</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/provinceorstate/new-jersey">New Jersey</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/provinceorstate/north-carolina">North Carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/provinceorstate/ohio">Ohio</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/company/paladin-enterprises-inc">Paladin Enterprises Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/paul-labonville">Paul Labonville</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/industryterm/prior-law">prior law</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/person/robert-j-lynn">ROBERT J. LYNN</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/organization/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/country/united-states">United States</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/currency/usd">USD</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/company/volkswagen">Volkswagen</category>
 <category domain="http://nhcaselaw.com/category/company/volkswagen-ag">Volkswagen AG</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:54:03 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DLG</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">131 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Difeo d/b/a/ Dredz International Imports v. Town of Plaistow, 00-E-0218 (Rockingham, Mar. 7, 2002)</title>
 <link>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/126</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Petitioner seeks a declaratory judgment that respondent&#039;s zoning ordinance prohibiting body piercing in the Town of Plaistow is unconstitutional, that the Town may regulate but not prohibit body piercing, and that petitioner is authorized to practice body piercing in his Plaistow store. Respondent objects and claims that its zoning ordinance is valid and constitutional, and that petitioner may not practice body piercing in the Town of Plaistow. The court held a trial on the merits on August 2, 2001, which continued on January 17, 2002.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nhcaselaw.com/files/difeo.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://nhcaselaw.com/document/126#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:39:02 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DLG</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">126 at http://nhcaselaw.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
