http://nhcaselaw.com/category/topics/value-marital-property The taxonomy view with a depth of 0. en http://nhcaselaw.com/opinion/235 <p>HICKS, J. The respondent, Robert Martel, appeals from a final decree of divorce issued by the Portsmouth Family Division (Sadler, J.). The petitioner, Susan Martel, cross-appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate in part and remand.</p> <p><a href="http://nhcaselaw.com/files/martel.pdf"></a></p> http://nhcaselaw.com/opinion/235#comments Tue, 06 May 2008 00:16:14 -0500 NHCaseLaw.com 235 at http://nhcaselaw.com http://nhcaselaw.com/document/142 <p>The main issues in dispute concern: (1) whether plaintiff is entitled to a divorce on the grounds of some form of marital "fault;" (2) whether certain property should properly be considered part of the marital estate; (3) the value of certain assets of the estate; (4) the manner in which the estate should be divided; and (5) the amount and duration of alimony plaintiff should receive. After briefly reciting the pertinent background facts, the court addresses these issues in turn below.</p> <p><a href="http://nhcaselaw.com/files/collins.pdf"></a></p> http://nhcaselaw.com/document/142#comments Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:47:13 -0600 DLG 142 at http://nhcaselaw.com