Home › Topics › EVIDENCE (85) › Attorney-Client Privilege (5)

Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Jul. 25, 2005)

Thu, 06/12/2008 - 17:39 — DLG
This case is sponsored by:

Topics: Attorney-Client Privilege, Discovery, Phone Jamming, Super. Ct. R. 35, Work Product

Case Information
Document Type: 
Opinion
Case name: 
Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al.
Docket Number: 
04-E-0328
Date: 
Jul 25 2005
Justice: 
Mangones, Philip P.
Jurisdiction: 
Hillsborough, North
Related Cases: 
Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Nov. 28, 2006)
Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Nov. 28, 2006)
Superior Court Citations: 
Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Jun. 15, 2005)
Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Jun. 12, 2006)
Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Oct. 14, 2004)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPERIOR COURT
HILLSBOROUGH, SS. NORTHERN DISTRICT
04-E-0328
RAYMOND BUCKLEY, ET AL.
v.
NEW HAMPSHIRE REPUBLICAN
STATE COMMITTEE, ET AL.

ORDER
The parties are before the Court in a civil action concerning a telephone jamming operation said to have been engaged in by defendants during the November, 2002 elections. That jamming operation was intended to disrupt or frustrate a "Get Out The Vote" telephone effort on the part of the plaintiffs.

Our full database of cases is available to registered users only. Don't worry, registration is FREE! Click here to register.