Home › Topics › CONTRACT (92) › Breach (23)

Davala, et al. v. Town of Merrimack, et al., 04-E-247 (Hillsborough, South, Feb. 25, 2005)

Sun, 06/01/2008 - 22:53 — DLG
This case is sponsored by:

Topics: Breach, Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Promissory Estoppel, Retirement Benefit Plans, Summary Judgment

Case Information
Document Type: 
Opinion
Case name: 
Davala, et al. v. Town of Merrimack, et al.
Docket Number: 
04-E-247
Date: 
Feb 25 2005
Justice: 
Hicks, Gary E.
Jurisdiction: 
Hillsborough, South
Related Cases: 
Davala, et al. v. Town of Merrimack, et al., 04-E-247 (Hillsborough, South, Aug. 4, 2005)
Superior Court Citations: 
Davala, et al. v. Town of Merrimack, et al., 04-E-247 (Hillsborough, South, Jun. 28, 2004)
Davala, et al. v. Town of Merrimack, et al., 04-E-247 (Hillsborough, South, Aug. 9, 2004)
Davala, et al. v. Town of Merrimack, et al., 04-E-247 (Hillsborough, South, Apr. 20, 2005)

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
HILLSBOROUGH, SS SUPERIOR COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
04-E-247

James A. Davala, et al.
V.
Town of Merrimack and its Board of Selectmen

ORDER ON RESPONDENTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The petitioners, James A. Davala, et al., brought this petition in equity against the respondents, the Town of Merrimack and its Board of Selectmen, seeking damages and other relief arising from the respondents' termination of certain retirement benefit plans. The respondents seek summary judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Our full database of cases is available to registered users only. Don't worry, registration is FREE! Click here to register.