Home › Topics › FEES (22) › Contingency Fee Agreements (1)

Buzby v. Bader, 97-C-352 (Rockingham, Apr. 1, 2002)

Mon, 05/26/2008 - 22:49 — DLG
This case is sponsored by:

Topics: Contingency Fee Agreements, Motion to Unseal

Case Information
Document Type: 
Opinion
Case name: 
Buzby v. Bader
Docket Number: 
97-C-352
Date: 
Apr 1 2002
Justice: 
McHugh, Kenneth R.
Jurisdiction: 
Rockingham
Superior Court Citations: 
Stewart v. Bader, 97-C-352, 97-E-138 (Rockingham, Nov. 9, 2004)

On February 27, 2002, the defendant filed a Motion to Unseal in which he asks the Court to permit him to examine the plaintiff's fee agreement with his present counsel and also asks the Court to provide him with a list of any and all sealed or ex parte filings in this case Although the defendant's motion suggests that none of the pleadings in this case should be sealed, it is clear that he has focused in on the sealing of the plaintiff's contingent fee agreement. Thus, the Court in the within order will only discuss the defendant's request in that regard.

Our full database of cases is available to registered users only. Don't worry, registration is FREE! Click here to register.