Home › Topics › EVIDENCE (85) › Attorney-Client Privilege (5)

Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Jun. 15, 2005)

Mon, 05/26/2008 - 22:44 — DLG
This case is sponsored by:

Topics: Attorney-Client Privilege, Contempt, Discovery, Motion for Reconsideration, Motion to Compel, Phone Jamming, Super. Ct. R. 35, Work Product

Case Information
Document Type: 
Opinion
Case name: 
Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al.
Docket Number: 
04-E-0328
Date: 
Jun 15 2005
Justice: 
Mangones, Philip P.
Jurisdiction: 
Hillsborough, North
Related Cases: 
Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Nov. 28, 2006)
Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Nov. 28, 2006)
Superior Court Citations: 
Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Jun. 12, 2006)
Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Jul. 25, 2005)
Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Oct. 14, 2004)

At issue in plaintiffs' motion to compel are various documents that plaintiffs had sought from defendant New Hampshire Republican State Committee ("NHRSC") during discovery in this civil action. In earlier proceedings, the Court had entered various discovery orders. Plaintiffs assert that NHRSC has failed to comply with the discovery orders as entered by the Court.

Our full database of cases is available to registered users only. Don't worry, registration is FREE! Click here to register.