NHCaseLaw.com

Before the court are identical motions filed by the Union Leader and Foster's Daily Democrat to unseal two previously sealed items of evidence: a collection of letters found in the home of the defendant, and a mental health evaluation report.

This suit under the Right-to-Know Law, RSA Chapter (1) 91-A, was commenced by Weare Powerful, a non-profit group composed of citizens of the Town of Weare ("Town"), against the Town, certain present and former members of the board of selectmen, the town administrator and town counsel, by a petition filed in this court on June 6, 1994.

On September 27, 1993, the Court heard Richard Ball's petition for temporary injunctive relief by way of offers of proof. The relevant facts are as follows.

The petitioner, the City of Dover ("the City"), brings this petition for declaratory judgment, requesting clarification to this court's order in docket #04-E-173 ('the prior order") in light of a request for information under the State's Right-to-Know Law, RSA Chapter 91-A. The respondent, the New Hampshire Union Leader ("the Union Leader"), seeks the disclosure of detailed information regarding City of Dover employment salaries and benefits. The court held a hearing on this matter on November 20, 2006. After review of the parties' arguments and the applicable law, the court finds and rules as follows.

The plaintiff filed this petition pursuant to RSA chapter 91-A, the Right-to-Know Law, seeking disclosure of billing statements submitted to the Town of Durham by the law firm of Upton, Sanders & Smith. The Town has provided the plaintiff with redacted copies of the billing statements, showing only the dates when services were rendered, the time spent, and the total amount billed. The Town asserts its attorney-client privilege with respect to the remaining information contained in the bills.

This is a petition by the publisher of a daily newspaper in Nashua, seeking a determination by the Court that the Nashua Board of Alderman violated RSA 91-A, the so called Right-to-Know Law, by meeting in closed session with the Nashua Board of Education. Petitioner also seeks an award of attorney's fees for litigating this matter. For the reasons set forth herein, the petition is GRANTED.

Nadeau, J. The respondent, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (PUC), appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Lewis, J.) granting the request of the petitioner, Brian D. Lamy, for an order compelling the PUC to disclose the names and street addresses of certain customers and awarding the petitioner costs under RSA 91-A:8 (Supp. 2004). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

This case arises out of a dispute between Mr. Brian Lamy (“petitioner”) and the Public Utilities Commission (“PUC”), in which the PUC denied the petitioner’s request to disclose the names and addresses of Public Service of New Hampshire (“PSNH”) customers who had submitted voltage complaints to PSNH between July 1, 1999 and August 1, 2003. Before the Court is the petitioner’s request for injunctive relief to require disclosure of those names and addresses, pursuant to New Hampshire’s Right-to-Know Law. Also before the Court is the petitioner’s supplemental request for the PUC to release documents related to a Request for Proposals (“RFPs”) issued in connection with the PUC’s investigation of PSNH service in the Town of Bedford, New Hampshire.