NHCaseLaw.com

On May 10, 1993, the Court held a hearing on the above-captioned action. The plaintiffs are citizens and taxpayers of New Hampshire who reside in Lee, Durham, or Madbury. These towns are in School Administrative Unit #5 (hereinafter "SAU 5"), which is made up of the Oyster River Cooperative School District (hereinafter the District"). The defendant, John Powers, is the superintendent of SAU 5. The defendant Oyster River School Board (hereinafter *the Board") has the authority to negotiate collective bargaining agreements with the Oyster River Teachers' Guild of SAU 5. Based upon the evidence presented, the Court finds the following facts.

HICKS, J. The petitioners, Ken Grant and Robert Ott, appeal an order of the Superior Court (Houran, J.) denying their petition for injunctive relief requiring that the defendant, Town of Barrington (town), place a warrant article on the town’s official ballot. We affirm.

HICKS, J. The petitioners, Ken Grant and Robert Ott, appeal an order of the Superior Court (Houran, J.) denying their petition for injunctive relief requiring that the defendant, Town of Barrington (town), place a warrant article on the town’s official ballot. We affirm.

The plaintiff, M. Elaine Tefft, instituted this action against the defendant, the Bedford School District (district), seeking an order from this court either (1) requiring that Article 1 of the warrant for an upcoming special school district meeting be divided into two separate questions or, alternatively, (2) enjoining the district from proceeding with a vote on Article 1 for a period of six months in order to “afford both parties the opportunity for complete due process.”