Area Variance (4)

Adamcryck v. City of Concord, et al., 07-E-443 (Merrimack, Jun. 5, 2008)

Petitioners, Suzanne and Todd Adamcryck, bring this pro se appeal of the decision of the City of Concord Zoning Board of Adjustment ("ZBA" or "the Board") granting variance requests by the intervenor, Laconia Savings Bank ("LSB"). The City and LSB object to the relief requested by the petitioners. After hearing and upon consideration of the parties' oral and written arguments, the record, and applicable law, the Court finds and rules as follows.

Daniels v. Town of Londonderry, 2008-047 (N.H. S.Ct., Jul. 15, 2008)

GALWAY, J. The petitioners, Ryder Daniels and Gary Morrissette, appeal an order of the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) upholding the decision of the defendants, Town of Londonderry and the Town of Londonderry Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA), allowing the intervenor, Omnipoint Communications, Inc. (Omnipoint), to build a wireless communications tower in an agricultural-residential zone. We affirm.

Nine A, LLC v. Town of Chesterfield, 2007-475 (N.H. S.Ct., Jun. 3, 2008)

GALWAY, J. The plaintiff, Nine A, LLC, challenges a Superior Court (Sullivan, J.) order affirming decisions of the Chesterfield Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) denying variance applications for development of a parcel of land bordering Spofford Lake in Chesterfield. On appeal the plaintiff argues that the superior court erred in finding that the requested variances violated the spirit of Chesterfield’s zoning ordinance and were contrary to the public interest and that the superior court erred in not finding that the plaintiff satisfied the remaining variance requirements. We affirm.

Page et al. v. City of Concord, 06-E-226 (Merrimack, Nov. 9, 2007)

The petitioners, Gail Page, Francine Philippe, and Douglas Ponusky, appeal the decision of the City of Concord Zoning Board of Adjustment (the “ZBA”) granting the intervenor, Whispering Heights, LLC’s, request for a variance from certain requirements of the City of Concord Zoning Ordinance (the “ordinance”). The Court held a hearing on the petitioners’ appeal. Upon review of the parties’ arguments, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the Court finds and rules as follows.
Syndicate content