NHCaseLaw.com

The defendant, Paul Zinck, is charged with numerous counts of Possession of Child Pornography, contrary to RSA 649-A:3, I(e) (Supp. 2004). On January 3, 2005, the court granted the defendant’s most recently filed Motion to Suppress in which he alleged, for the first time, that the State failed to conduct a search of his computer and related equipment in a timely fashion. Specifically, the defendant argued that the 18-month delay between the time the warrant was signed and the State’s first efforts to search his computer violated both the State and Federal constitutional protections against unreasonable searches. The State now moves this court to reconsider the order. For the reasons stated here, the motion is DENIED.