Statute of Limitations (10)

Clapp v. Goffstown School District, 07-E-0249 (Hillsborough, North, Sep. 2, 2008)

Petitioner Diane Clapp ("Clapp") seeks a declaration that Respondent, the Goffstown School District ("GSD"), improperly failed to inform the New Hampshire Retirement System and its predecessor ("NHRS") of GSD's 1950 vote to enroll GSD's support staff into the NHRS. The Court held a bench trial on the matter on June 18, 2008, and finds and rules as follows.

Thomas v. Telegraph Publishing Co., et al., 2003-700 (N.H. S.Ct., Sep. 24, 2004)

NADEAU, J. In these appeals, we are asked to determine whether the Trial Court (Groff, J.) erred in: (1) finding personal jurisdiction over four Massachusetts defendants; and (2) denying the plaintiff’s motion to amend his writ. We affirm and remand.

Buckley, et al. v. New Hampshire Republican State Committee, et al., 04-E-0328 (Hillsborough, North, Jun. 12, 2006)

This matter arises out of an alleged phone-jamming scheme during the November 2002 election. The background of this matter has been summarized in earlier orders. Therefore, the Court proceeds directly to the merits of the pending motions to dismiss, regarding which a hearing was held on April 11, 2006.

Cannon v. Wise, 02-C-101 (Merrimack, Sep. 23, 2003)

Plaintiff Shelley Cannon has sued Ronna Wise, Esquire ("Attorney Wise") for legal negligence in her representation of Ms. Cannon in connection with her divorce from her former husband, Fred Feddersen. Attorney Wise moves to dismiss first, arguing that the action was not commenced within the three-year statute of limitations as required by RSA 508:4, 1, or in the alternative that the suit lacks causation and damages. Ms. Cannon objects. For the reasons stated below, Attorney Wise's Motion to Dismiss Based on the Statute of Limitations is GRANTED.

Garvey v. Quality Safety Systems Co., et al., 02-C-069 (Strafford, Jun. 17, 2003)

The plaintiff has brought a six-count Writ against Quality Safety Systems Co., Toyota Motor Corp., Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc., and Auto Fair Toyota of Manchester to recover damages for injuries she sustained when the seatbelt of her leased 1997 Toyota Tacoma malfunctioned. On July 17, 2002, the court (Fauver, J.) dismissed Count I (Strict Liability), Count II (Negligence), and Count VI (Res Ipsa Loquitor) as against Auto Fair Toyota and Quality Safety. On November 12, 2002, the court (Fauver, J.) granted summary judgment on Count III (Breach of Express: Warranty) as against Auto Fair and Count I (Strict Liability), Count. II (Negligence), and Count VI (Res Ipsa Loquitor) as against Toyota Motor Sales.

Bennett v. Glickfield, 99-C-197 (Strafford, Sep. 5, 2001)

The plaintiff brought this malicious prosecution action seeking to recover damages flowing from a civil action previously brought by the defendant against the plaintiff. The defendant moves to dismiss this present claim arguing the claim is either barred by res judicata or by a-three year statute of limitations.

Dandley v. Bishop Guertin High School, Inc., et al., 02-C-0170 (Hillsborough, South, Sep. 25, 2003)

This is a civil action for damages for sexual abuse committed against the plaintiff by Brother Beaulieu, a member of the Order of the Sacred Heart, a former teacher at Bishop Guertin High School, and a former staff employee at Camp Fatima. The plaintiff alleges he was sexually abused and molested by Beaulieu between 1972 and 1975 while a camper at Camp Fatima and a student at Bishop Guertin High School. The alleged abuse ended in the fall of 1975 during the plaintiffs junior year at Bishop Guertin when Beaulieu attempted to force the plaintiff to perform fellatio. After the forcible assault, the plaintiff left school and never returned.

Conrad v. Hazen, et al., 93-C-01210 (Rockingham, Jun. 25, 1996)

Inasmuch as the procedural history of this case is so unusual, it must be reviewed prior to the Court's ruling on the issues presented for determination. On September 2, 1993, the plaintiff brought suit against three defendants, Michael Hazen, Ralph Maxwell, and the Kingdom, Inc., on several legal theories as a result of her being sexually assaulted in June of 1977. She alleged that the assault was perpetrated by Defendant Hazen on property owned by Defendant The Kingdom, Inc., at a time when Defendant Maxwell was its minister.

Appeal of Anheuser-Busch Co., 2007-197 (N.H. S.Ct., Jan. 15, 2008)

HICKS, J. The petitioners, Anheuser-Busch Company, Inc. (Anheuser) and ACE USA as its insurer, appeal a decision of the New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board (board) requiring them to pay disability benefits to the respondent, Douglas Bennett, following his knee replacement surgery in January 2006. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Chesley v. Harvey Industries, Inc., 2007-682 (N.H. S.Ct., Apr. 22, 2008)

DUGGAN, J. The plaintiff, Elmer E. Chesley, appeals a decision of the Superior Court (McGuire, J.) dismissing his civil action against the defendant, Harvey Industries, Inc., for failure to file within the three-year statute of limitations. See RSA 508:4 (1997). We reverse and remand.
Syndicate content