Notice of Meetings (3)

Weare Powerful v. Town of Weare, et al., 94-E-182 (Belknap, Dec. 16, 1994)

This suit under the Right-to-Know Law, RSA Chapter (1) 91-A, was commenced by Weare Powerful, a non-profit group composed of citizens of the Town of Weare ("Town"), against the Town, certain present and former members of the board of selectmen, the town administrator and town counsel, by a petition filed in this court on June 6, 1994.

Chretien, et al. v. Sununu, et al., 86-E-00279-B (Merrimack, Dec. 30, 1986)

In deciding whether to grant or deny defendants' motion to dismiss, the court is required by law to consider plaintiffs' pleadings of fact and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from those pleadings as true. Nutter v. Frisbie Mem. Hosp., 124 N.H. 791, 793 (1984). Accordingly, the court considers the following to be true.

Legasse v. Board of Selectmen, et al., 93-E-0026 (Cheshire, Jun. 25, 1993)

This is an equity action in which the plaintiffs claim that the defendants have violated RSA 91-A, the Right-to-Know law.
Syndicate content